High School Faculty Teaching Performance Evaluation on Remote Learning Amidst Pandemic

COVID-19 has wreaked havoc across the world and like any critical sector, education has been hit hard. To respond to the needs students enrolled in HEIs, different HEIs in the Philippines have implemented proactive policies for the continuance of education in times of pandemic. This study utilized a descriptive study to evaluate the teaching performance in navigation and time on task organization; course design; communication and interaction, and content; to test the significant difference of respond on the evaluation on teaching performance on remote learning when grouped according to profile; lastly propose action plan. Also, to identify the need improvements of their remote teaching performances. Different literature review revealed that Faculty-student communication and interaction were identified as a common barrier to implement effective teaching performance in remote learning. While, this study shows the management invested on enabling their faculty to gain knowledge on socio-emotional interaction and learning to manage remote learning and secure a significant online social and supportive presence, this may result in a better overall online teaching experience, also, it is shown that student’s participation is visible throughout the course. Moreover, it was revealed that regardless of their secondary level, high school faculties performed effectively in terms navigation and time on task organization, course design and course content. Also, based on the result it was concluded that there are significant differences on how the students evaluated their faculties’ performances when grouped according to grade level, age and gender. The future researchers may conduct separate study for junior and senior high school to validate the differences of evaluation to teaching performances within the focused group and include the identification of technology (device/gadget, internet, etc.) used in remote learning, social and economic status, and geographical aspect of the students.

Keywords – Communication and Interaction, Course Content and Design, Navigation and Time on Task

Organization and Teaching performance