Development of an Impact Paradigm for Institutional Research Productivity

The study described and evaluated the impact on productivity and accountability of tertiary education institutions’ research program profile presented in terms of policy/agenda, organizational structure, resources, and activities. Program impact, issues, and policy implications based on existing institutional research environments were derived. Finally, an impact model for institutional research productivity was evolved. Qualitative single-case research design was used. Triangulation with a criteria-referenced survey analysis and round-table discussion was sources of data. The unit of analysis was the institution. Single and cross-case analysis were used to analyze and interpret field notes consisting of descriptive profiles and graphic displays of the organizational structures, research budget, and faculty composition of the institutions and research programs. Findings show outcomes of research such as policy/agenda, organizational structure, staffing pattern/incentive scheme, and activities are impact indicators of research process management. Eight alterable productivity-processes outcomes defined to significantly influence impact are clear, focused and specific goals; staffing pattern/ incentive scheme; administrative arrangements; research council as monitoring mechanism; generation; dissemination; verification, and information. The evolved analogue model can measure the impact of the research process enhancing research management. An action plan considers the productivity-processes outcomes in support of a vision towards collaborative networks.

Keywords: Research Programs, Research Process Management, Productivity Analogue Model